Dec 22, 2014
Today we go through several important teachings from C.S. Lewis (and AW Tozer) in contrast to that of John Piper regarding the true nature of God's glory as reflected in scripture. You do not want to miss this as it comes as close to a debate between these two as one might hope to experience.
I also take a few minutes to address John Piper's rebuke of Austin Fischer who recently wrote, "Young, Restless, and No Longer Reformed." (A book I highly recommend to all listeners)
In the most recent "Ask Pastor John" podcast with Dr. John Piper he
answers the question, "What
Arminians have influenced you the most." He was
gracious in his reply but he did erroneously allude to the belief
that CS Lewis was not to be included among the list of Arminians
who have had influence on him because of a recent presentation at
one of his conferences that apparently attempted to prove CS Lewis was
Calvinistic. 
I almost fell out of my chair...literally.
Those of you who know my story are aware that reading CS Lewis (along with AW Tozer) is what helped to lead me to reexamine my interpretative methods and eventually recant Calvinism. I have read every word of CS Lewis, some of them multiple times. I have a theological "man crush" (look it up, its a real thing) on this guy, and while I may be uncertain about some scholars stance on this issue I have absolutely no doubt about CS Lewis.
I'll be brief here because it will not take long to prove my point. Here are a few quotes from CS Lewis that may help shed some light on this:
"God has made it a rule for Himself that He won’t alter people’s character by force. He can and will alter them – but only if the people will let Him. In that way He has really and truly limited His power. Sometimes we wonder why He has done so, or even wish that He hadn’t. But apparently He thinks it worth doing. He would rather have a world of free beings, with all its risks, than a world of people who did right like machines because they couldn’t do anything else. The more we succeed in imagining what a world of perfect automatic beings would be like, the more, I think, we shall see His wisdom." - CS Lewis, The Trouble with X
And from the Screwtape letters...
"You must have often wondered why the Enemy does not make more use of His power to be sensibly present to human souls in any degree He chooses and at any moment. But you now see that the Irresistible and the Indisputable are the two weapons which the very nature of His scheme forbids Him to use. Merely to over-ride a human will (as His felt presence in any but the faintest and most mitigated degree would certainly do) would be for Him useless. He cannot ravish. He can only woo. For His ignoble idea is to eat the cake and have it; the creatures are to be one with Him, but yet themselves; merely to cancel them, or assimilate them, will not serve. He is prepared to do a little overriding at the beginning. He will set them off with communications of His presence which, though faint, seem great to them, with emotional sweetness, and easy conquest over temptation. But He never allows this state of affairs to last long. Sooner or later He withdraws, if not in fact, at least from their conscious experience, all those supports and incentives. He leaves the creature to stand up on its own legs—to carry out from the will alone duties which have lost all relish. It is during such trough periods, much more than during the peak periods, that it is growing into the sort of creature He wants it to be." -CS Lewis
Lewis also says this in "The Problem of Pain."
"If God's moral judgement differs from ours so that our 'black' may be His 'white', we can mean nothing by calling Him good; for to say 'God is good', while asserting that His goodness is wholly other than ours, is really only to say 'God is we know not what'. And an utterly unknown quality in God cannot give us moral grounds for loving or obeying Him. If He is not (in our sense) 'good' we shall obey, if at all, only through fear -- and should be equally ready to obey an omnipotent Fiend. The doctrine of Total Depravity -- when the consequence is drawn that, since we are totally depraved, our idea of God is worth simply nothing -- may thus turn Christianity into a form of devil-worship."
Enough said...
And, NO there is no evidence that CS Lewis later recanted these views, in case someone is wondering.
Piper also suggests that "Arminians" are more philosophical
and less exegetical in their approach to interpretation. This
is simply untrue and Dr. Piper never provides any support to back
up this accusation. I discuss some of these issues more
in-depth in THIS
PODCAST.
Please join the conversation at www.soteriology101.com! Enjoy!